Gait & Posture

Impaired gait performance and stability is a key symptom often defining disease outcome in people with Multiple Sclerosis. Step-by-step foot placement control in response to variations in the center-of-mass kinematic state is a crucial gait stability mechanism, especially in the mediolateral direction. Even though it is known that people with Multiple Sclerosis are at an increased risk of falling, step-by-step foot placement control remains to be characterized in this population. Here, we explored characteristic foot placement control in ten people with early stage Multiple Sclerosis, compared to 21 controls walking at a similar average gait speed, during 1-minute steady-state treadmill walking. Kinematic data were analyzed using a linear feedback model that correlated foot placement with the center-of-mass kinematic state during the preceding swing phase. People with Multiple Sclerosis demonstrated step-by-step foot placement control in both the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions. No differences were found in foot placement precision between groups. However, foot placement responses to variations in center-of-mass velocity proved stronger in people with Multiple Sclerosis. Moreover, the contribution of mediolateral center-of-mass velocity feedback to the control mechanism was higher in people with Multiple Sclerosis as compared to neurologically healthy controls. Our results suggest that foot placement control is still retained in early clinically evident stages of Multiple Sclerosis, but is realized through differently weighted sensory feedback control.

Static force plates (FP) are the gold standard for measuring ground reaction forces (GRF) and computing joint moments through inverse dynamics in gait analysis. However, they are restricted to controlled environments, and the number of steps analyzed is limited by the plates embedded in the floor. To address these limitations, portable solutions such as sensorized insoles, socks, or shoes have emerged. Yet, creating wearable systems capable of measuring three-dimensional GRF in real-world conditions remains challenging. Current sensorized shoes often incorporate thick sensors (up to 2 cm), reducing usability and limiting their application in pathological populations or dynamic tasks like running. This study evaluates the usability of ShokacShoes, a novel sensorized shoe integrating three thin, three-dimensional force sensors, and explores its potential as a Wearable Force Plate (WFP). Eight healthy participants performed slow, natural, and fast walking using two insole configurations. Force and temporal metrics were derived from WFP and FP data. Results indicate that WFP enables accurate step segmentation and detects significant effects of speed and insole type on temporal and force metrics, confirming its reliability under different walking conditions. Comparisons with FP revealed differences in force metrics and signal morphology, though temporal parameters remained consistent. These results are likely due to sensor quantity and positioning. Thereby, ShokacShoes represent a valid solution capable of measuring three-dimensional forces within commercial footwear. Future work will focus on validating the applicability of a new version of ShokacShoes against gold-standard FP in a comprehensive validation study involving diverse real-world scenarios and pathological conditions.

Background and purpose: Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is a multifaceted condition where proximal, local, and distal factors may contribute to symptoms and limitations. How these factors collectively contribute to PFPS remains poorly understood. Therefore, this study compared proximal, local, and distal mechanical characteristics between individuals with and without PFPS and investigated their association with pain intensity and functional disability. Methods: Eighty participants were included: 40 individuals with unilateral or bilateral PFPS, 40 healthy controls. Isometric muscle strength of hip, trunk, and ankle was assessed using a handheld dynamometer. Joint alignment (Q-angle, rearfoot angle, pelvic tilt) and muscle flexibility (iliotibial band, hamstrings, quadriceps, gastrocnemius, and soleus) were measured using standard clinical techniques. Pain severity was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), and functional disability was evaluated using the Kujala score. Results: Individuals with PFPS showed reduced iliotibial band flexibility, decreased hamstring and soleus length, lower hip abductor strength, and greater anterior and lateral pelvic tilt (all p < 0.02). Multivariate analysis identified reduced iliotibial band flexibility (OR = 7.48) and greater anterior pelvic tilt (OR = 11.75) as independent associates of PFPS. Anterior pelvic tilt predicted pain severity, while anterior trunk muscle strength and Q-angle predicted disability. Discussion: Reduced iliotibial band flexibility and increased anterior pelvic tilt were independently associated with PFPS, while anterior pelvic tilt predicted pain severity and anterior trunk muscle strength and Q-angle predicted functional disability. Clinical assessment and rehabilitation of PFPS should therefore extend beyond the knee to include iliotibial band flexibility, pelvic alignment, and trunk muscle strength.

Objective and scalable approaches for detecting subtle motor impairment in isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD), a prodromal stage of Parkinson's disease, remain limited. We investigated whether markerless motion capture from single RGB-camera videos can identify gait abnormalities in people living with iRBD and provide interpretable digital biomarkers. We retrospectively analyzed 93 standardized walking videos from three clinical sites. Human pose estimation extracted 12 body markers and 14 kinematic time series. Thirty-five machine learning approaches classified healthy controls (HC) and people with iRBD. The Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part 3 (MDS-UPDRS III) served as the clinical baseline. The best-performing model (tsfresh+XGBoost) achieved an AUROC of 0.739, significantly outperforming the MDS-UPDRS III sum score when trained on data from all three sites. Harmonized multi-site training improved performance. SHAP identified hip-related temporal features as key contributors, which differed between groups and showed stronger associations with regional dopaminergic deficits than clinical scores. Single-camera gait analysis may provide scalable digital biomarkers for low-cost screening and monitoring of prodromal PD.

Purpose: Identifying head impacts linked to brain injury in sport remains challenging. Instrumented mouthguards quantify head-impact kinematics, and finite element (FE) modelling can transform these data into brain strain estimates, which may better reflect injury risk than kinematics alone. Here, we examined associations between mouthguard-measured kinematics, FE-derived strain, and plasma brain injury biomarker GFAP following head impacts. Methods: We analysed 41 video-verified impacts from male Australian football players, including 22 assessed for concussion (17 diagnosed) and 19 unassessed. Instrumented mouthguards recorded peak linear acceleration (PLA), peak rotational acceleration, and peak rotational velocity (PRV). Brain strain was estimated using the Imperial College FE brain model, and plasma GFAP was quantified using Simoa. Biomechanical-GFAP associations were examined using Spearman correlations and segmented regression. Results: For impacts overall, plasma GFAP was moderately correlated with PLA ({rho}=0.46, 95% CI: 0.20-0.66), PRV ({rho}=0.53, 95% CI: 0.20-0.78), and strain ({rho}=0.60, 95% CI: 0.32-0.80). Associations were stronger within concussion cases for strain ({rho}=0.86, 95% CI: 0.58-0.97) and PRV ({rho}=0.64, 95% CI: 0.15-0.93). Piecewise regression identified strain levels above which strain-GFAP relationships steepened across the whole-brain and brainstem. In concussion cases, supra-threshold brainstem strain was associated with greater symptoms. Conclusion: Finite element brain strain may better predict brain injury risk following a sport-related head impact than peak acceleration metrics. Stronger associations with plasma GFAP, particularly among concussion cases, and evidence of a biomechanical threshold, support the use of biomarker-informed strain measures in future risk modelling and the development of brain injury screening thresholds.

Background: Newly available arm angle data offers a new dimension to understand rising rates of arm injury in MLB pitchers. Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between arm angle, pitch characteristics, and elbow and forearm injury in MLB pitchers.<br><br> Study Design: Retrospective cohort study; Level of evidence, 3 Methods: Statcast data from 2020 to 2025 and MLB injured list (IL) data were used to evaluate arm angle and pitch characteristics in relation to elbow and forearm injuries. Results are presented with and without requirements on prior season workload and for same-season and next-season injury incidence. A generalized additive model (GAM) was used to capture non-linear dependence and interactions between selected features and injury incidence to the elbow or forearm. Average marginal effect (AME) odds ratios are reported for main effect terms. Results: N = 3,812 pitcher-seasons were included. 29% pitchers who underwent UCLR did so in the same season as a forearm injury (tmean=44, tmedian=27 days to surgery). Arm angle, fastball usage, and their interaction were the three most predictive features. Arm angle was positively related to incidence of injury (ORmeanAME=1.014), fastball usage was inversely related to incidence of injury (ORmeanAME=0.243), and arm angle moderated the effect fastball usage at high arm angle, where increased usage was no longer protective. Slider velocity (ORmeanAME=1.072), spin rate (ORmeanAME=1.001), and usage (ORmeanAME=2.039) also significantly predicted injury risk. Fastball velocity was not significant in any fit, with ORmeanAME=0.999 across all fits. Fit-level Nagelkerke R2 values ranged from .019 to .052. Conclusion: Fastball usage and arm angle, not velocity, predicted elbow and forearm injury risk among MLB pitchers, and arm angle was the single most predictive feature. The heterogeneity of risk factors as a function of arm angle, and the novelty of MLB arm angle data, may explain why fastball usage has been previously underexplored as a risk factor. Keywords: baseball; arm angle; fastball velocity; fastball usage; spin rate; UCL; ulnar collateral ligament; elbow injury; forearm injury; Statcast

Purpose: Lower-limb prosthesis use involves interacting physical, psychosocial, and device-related outcomes that may not be fully captured by conventional clinical assessment. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a stakeholder-informed framework of outcome domains relevant to meaningful everyday prosthesis use. Materials and Methods: A mixed-methods participatory design comprised a structured synthesis of selected clinically relevant content from five established patient-reported outcome measures; semi-structured interviews and importance and actionability ratings with 18 contributors (12 prosthesis users, four clinicians, and two industrial partners); and integration of the synthesis, qualitative, and rating findings. Interview records were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, and ratings were analysed descriptively. Results: The resulting framework comprised four interrelated domains: Mobility, Physical Function, Psychosocial Wellbeing, and Prosthesis Experience. Mobility showed the clearest convergence across stakeholder perspectives. Prosthesis users showed the largest importance actionability gap for Prosthesis Experience (4.5 vs 3.0), whereas clinicians showed the largest gap for Psychosocial Wellbeing (5.0 vs 3.0). Interviews highlighted day-to-day variability in prosthesis use and the influence of confidence, fatigue, comfort, environmental conditions, social context, and device usability. Conclusions: Meaningful outcome assessment in prosthetic rehabilitation should extend beyond mobility alone to consider physical function, psychosocial wellbeing, and prosthesis experience within everyday contexts. The proposed framework provides a stakeholder-informed foundation for multidimensional outcome assessment in prosthetic rehabilitation.

Breast cancer survivors frequently experience upper-limb impairments, making continuous monitoring essential for effective rehabilitation. We propose REINA (Recognize-Then-Infer Wearable-to-App AI Framework), a two-stage deep-learning approach for remote monitoring of motor function during breast cancer rehabilitation using wearable-device data. Inertial measurement unit (IMU) signals from wearable devices are first used to recognize physical activities via supervised learning, followed by an activity-specific recurrent neural network (RNN) to infer corresponding electromyography (EMG) signals. REINA establishes reliable inference of neuromuscular activity from wearable IMU data, enabling real-time, cost-effective assessment of motor function recovery in real-world settings.

Background: Sweeping sliders with large horizontal break are hypothesized to be associated with arm injury, and prior work suggests a link between slider usage, arm angle, and injury. Purpose: To evaluate whether arm angle and slider horizontal movement are associated with elbow or forearm injury risk in MLB pitchers. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study; Level of evidence, 3 Methods: Statcast data from 2020-2025 and injury data were used to study the relationship between sliders and arm injuries. Pitchers with at least 30 innings pitched (IP) were evaluated for same- and next-season injury incidence to the Elbow, Forearm, or Elbow/Forearm. A generalized additive model (GAM) related pitch-level variables to injury incidence, and average marginal effect (AME) odds ratios are reported for main effects. Results: All fits were significant at p<.01. Fits for same-season (N=1,957, p=.00008, R2=.066) and next-season (N=2,511, p=.00005, R2=.053) Elbow/Forearm injury were significant at p<.001. Same-season (R2=.061) and next-season (R2=.055) Forearm injury fits had p=.001. Main effects for slider glove-side movement and fastball usage, their interactions with arm angle, and arm angle main effects were the most predictive features. Across the three fits where the slider glove-side movement main effect was significant, odds ratios ranged from 1.03 to 1.07, meaning that each additional inch of slider glove-side movement was associated with a 3% to 7% increase in the observed injury incidence. Furthermore, this effect was magnified at high arm angle and muted at low arm angle. Conclusion: We observed that slider horizontal movement, arm angle, and their interaction were significantly associated with incidence of Forearm and combined Elbow/Forearm injury. This effect was weak or non-existent at low arm angles and strong at high arm angles, suggesting that arm angle moderates the risk of slider horizontal movement, and providing evidence that sliders with large horizontal break (e.g. sweepers) may pose an injury risk. Keywords: baseball; sweeper; slider; arm angle; horizontal movement; elbow injury; forearm injury

Background: Lumbar disc herniation, with or without concomitant disc degeneration, is a major cause of lumbar radiculopathy and low back pain, which also a key public musculoskeletal disorder without an exact pathophysiology. Studies have suggested that inflammatory cells and biochemical markers of inflammation also play an important role in lumbar radiculopathy in addition to nerve compression. The aim of the present study was to assess the association of selected circulatory inflammatory markers (CRP, hs-CRP and E-selectin) in patients with lumbar disc herniation without radiological degeneration (LDH) and lumbar disc herniation with radiological degeneration (LDHD). Materials & methods: This case-control study included 208 participants, comprising 104 patients with lumbar disc pathology and 104 controls. Patients were further stratified into LDH (n=67) and LDHD (n=37). Serum CRP, hs-CRP and E-selectin concentrations were measured. Results: Among the patients, 35.6 % presented with LDHD while 64.4 % had only LDH. Significantly increased median hs-CRP (p<0.001) and CRP (p<0.001) were observed in patients groups compared to controls, while CRP showing a consistent independent association across the combined disease (OR=1.68, 95% CI=1.33-2.14, p<0.001), LDHD (OR=1.62, 95% CI=1.16-2.20, p=0.005) and LDH (OR=1.69, 95% CI=1.30-2.20, p<0.001) multivariable models. No significant difference was observed in serum E-selectin between the study groups. Multivariable models incorporating inflammatory and clinical variables demonstrated substantially greater discriminatory performance than individual biomarkers alone. Conclusion: Elevated circulating CRP and hs-CRP concentrations were associated with lumbar disc pathology, with CRP showing a consistent independent association across the combined disease, LDH and LDHD multivariable models, whereas E-selectin showed no significant association. Multivariable models incorporating inflammatory and clinical variables demonstrated greater discriminatory performance than individual biomarkers. These findings support a potential systemic inflammatory component in lumbar disc pathology, although the cross-sectional nature of the measurements does not establish causality or a local inflammatory response within the disc.

Background: Aerobic exercise is recommended during stroke rehabilitation to improve cardiorespiratory fitness and support recovery; however, participation rates remain low. While institutional and system-level barriers have been widely examined, less is known about how individual patient factors influence engagement in aerobic exercise during rehabilitation. Objectives: We aimed to determine whether depressive symptoms, apathy, self-efficacy and outcome expectations for exercise, perceived barriers, or past exercise history were associated with aerobic exercise participation in stroke rehabilitation. Methods: In this prospective cohort sub-study, adults admitted to in- or out-patient stroke rehabilitation at three urban hospitals completed validated questionnaires assessing depressive symptoms, apathy, exercise self-efficacy, outcome expectations for exercise, perceived barriers to being active, and premorbid exercise history. Participants were separated into two groups for analysis: those who completed aerobic exercise during rehabilitation and those who did not. Equivalence testing and between-group comparisons were performed. Results: Sixty-two participants were enrolled; 16 participated in aerobic exercise and 46 did not. Groups were not equivalent on any individual-level factors. Compared to non-participants, those who performed aerobic exercise had significantly higher depressive symptom scores (p=0.0025) and lower self-efficacy for exercise (p=0.0087). Non-participants demonstrated significantly higher apathy (p=0.0007). No significant differences were found for outcome expectations, perceived barriers, or exercise history. Conclusion: Depressive symptoms and lower self-efficacy did not impede aerobic exercise participation during rehabilitation. Increased apathy, however, was associated with non-participation. Findings highlight the need for individually tailored aerobic exercise prescriptions that consider motivational and affective factors to optimize engagement during stroke rehabilitation.

Background: Mutations in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) are the most common genetic risk factor for Parkinson's disease (PD). G2019S, the most common pathogenic variant, has been linked to milder motor symptoms, but the effects of other LRRK2 variants on disease trajectory remain incompletely characterized. R1441G, the second most common pathogenic variant, co-occurs with the PD risk variant M1646T on a shared haplotype. Whether this haplotype confers a distinct rate of motor progression has not been established. Methods: We analyzed up to 12 years of longitudinal data from 603 participants in the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) with PD and available whole-genome sequencing data: 394 sporadic PD, 169 G2019S carriers, 20 R1441G+M1646T carriers, and 20 M1646T carriers. Motor symptom progression (MDS-UPDRS III) was assessed using linear mixed-effects models with genotype-by-time interactions, adjusted for age at onset, disease duration at baseline, sex, race, baseline score, and levodopa equivalent daily dose. Results: R1441G+M1646T carriers exhibited 76% slower progression in OFF-state MDS-UPDRS III than sporadic PD (0.50 vs. 2.04 points/year; {beta}=-1.54 [95% CI: -2.48, -0.60]; p=0.001). G2019S carriers exhibited 26% slower progression (1.52 points/year; {beta}=-0.52 [-0.99, -0.06]; p=0.03). M1646T carriers did not differ from sporadic PD (p=0.60). Slower progression in R1441G+M1646T carriers was characterized by attenuated bradykinesia (64% slower; p=0.008), axial decline (76% slower; p=0.002), and a lack of orofacial symptom progression (p<0.001). R1441G+M1646T carriers also exhibited 55% slower self-reported motor decline (MDS-UPDRS II; p=0.04) Conclusions: R1441G+M1646T carriers exhibit substantially slower motor progression than sporadic PD while M1646T carriers do not.

Objective: To examine how medial plantar nerve shear wave speed (Cs) and viscosity coefficient (Vi) are associated with the severity of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), and to assess their ability to differentiate adjacent severity categories. Materials and Methods: Based on TCSS, the 113 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were assigned to the non-DPN (n = 33), mild DPN (n = 46), and moderate DPN (n = 34) groups. Medial plantar nerve Cs and Vi were measured using shear wave elastography and viscosity imaging. Receiver operating characteristic analysis evaluated Cs, Vi, and their logistic regression-based combination; areas under the curves (AUCs) were compared using DeLong tests. Results: Cs and Vi increased progressively across the three groups (both P < 0.001). For non-DPN versus mild DPN, the AUCs of Cs, Vi, and the combined model were 0.688 (95% CI, 0.604-0.772), 0.741 (0.660-0.822), and 0.745 (0.665-0.826), respectively, without significant pairwise differences. For mild versus moderate DPN, the corresponding AUCs were 0.707 (0.625-0.789), 0.794 (0.724-0.865), and 0.799 (0.731-0.867). The combined model outperformed Cs (P = 0.045), whereas Cs versus Vi and Vi versus the combined model did not differ significantly (P = 0.162 and 1.000, respectively). Conclusion: Medial plantar nerve Cs and Vi increased with DPN severity. Their combination improved discrimination between mild and moderate DPN compared with Cs alone but not with Vi alone. Quantitative medial plantar nerve viscoelastic assessment may complement clinical severity grading.

Background Mirror therapy (MT)-specifically paradigms using mirror visual feedback (MVF)-is widely used in neurorehabilitation; however, mechanistic implementations vary substantially in movement content, rhythmicity and attentional demands. This protocol describes an acute mechanistic, within-participant fNIRS screening study designed to compare three prespecified upper-limb mirror-therapy task paradigms and to quantify associated subjective experience after each condition in healthy adults during a single visit. Methods and analysis This is a single-centre, within-participant, randomised crossover study conducted at Wuhan Wuchang Hospital (Wuhan, China). Healthy adults aged 18-35 years will complete three task conditions once each in a counterbalanced order using a 3*3 Latin-square scheme: UMT1 (task-oriented rhythmic functional movement), UMT2 (open-ended free movement with auditory control), and UMT3 (non-functional rhythmic movement). fNIRS will be acquired using the NirSmart-6000A system during a standardised block design. The primary outcome is ROI-level HbO activation quantified as GLM-derived {beta} estimates within the prespecified primary ROIs (bilateral SM1/M1 and bilateral PMC). Secondary outcomes include ROI-level windowed {Delta}HbO (5-20 s post-onset relative to the immediately preceding rest; descriptive only), ROI-level {Delta}HbR, and post-condition subjective ratings (illusion, immersion, confusion and fatigue; 1-7 Likert). Condition effects will be analysed using linear mixed-effects models with fixed effects for condition and period and prespecified multiplicity-adjusted pairwise contrasts. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Wuchang Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Approval No.: 2025-112-01; approved on 2025-08-21). The study is expected to be minimal risk. Findings will be disseminated through publication of this protocol manuscript and subsequent results manuscripts and conference presentations. Trial registration number Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2600116634). This study is conducted as a prespecified mechanistic sub-study under the overarching registered project.

Background: Higher Body Mass Index (BMI) is an established risk factor of sleep disturbance. It is not known if the effect is homogeneous across the lifecourse or if there is a particular time point in life that might be best to target. Methods: Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was used to investigated the effect of childhood adiposity (adjusting on adulthood adiposity and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)) on insomnia, morning chronotype, sleep duration, daytime sleepiness and daytime napping. Similarly, total, and direct effect of adulthood adiposity on these outcomes was explored. We used summary statistics from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of UK Biobank for childhood and adulthood adiposity (n=453,169) and large-scale consortia of OSA (Million Veteran Program) (n=410,268), insomnia, and chronotype (23andMe) (n=1,978,022 and n=248,1000, respectively). Results: Two-sample univariable MR analysis provided no evidence of an effect of genetically predicted childhood adiposity on later life insomnia (Odds ratio (OR)= 0.94, 95% Confidence interval (CI)= 0.87, 1.03). Whereas, multivariable MR (adjusted for adulthood adiposity) analysis provide strong evidence of direct protective effect of genetically predicted childhood adiposity on later life insomnia (OR= 0.70, CI= 0.64, 0.77). Further, both in univariable and multivariable MR, a strong positive effect of increased childhood body size on morning chronotype was observed (OR= 1.16, CI= 1.01, 1.33 and OR= 1.36, CI= 1.15, 1.62, respectively) after accounting for adulthood body size. In both analysis the estimate did not change considerably after aditionally adjusting for OSA. However, childhood and adulthood adiposity found to be associated with OSA and OSA with insomnia. In both univariable and multivariable analysis, increased body size in adulthood increased the risk of having insomnia and a morning chronotype. Conclusions: The findings suggest that higher body size in childhood is not a risk factor for later life insomnia, whereas higher body size in adulthood was. Further, if healthy body size is maintained in adulthood, high childhood adiposity may decrease the risk of insomnia and increase the risk of being a morning person in later life. Keywords: childhood, adulthood, obesity, insomnia, morning chronotype, medelian randomization

Disseminating study results to participants is an ethical responsibility for researchers but remains uncommon in low- and middle-income countries, and participants preferences for receiving study results are poorly understood. This study examined study result dissemination preferences among pregnant women in a phase III malaria prevention trial in Papua New Guinea (PNG). Participants completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire (survey) assessing their interest in and motivation for receiving trial results and preferences for dissemination methods and content. Associations between participants characteristics and dissemination preferences were explored using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Of 1172 trial participants, 96.0% (1125/1172) completed the survey, and of these 99.6% (1121/1125) wanted to learn about the trial results. The main motivation factors driving participants interest were an acknowledgment of their contribution to research (51.7%; n=579) and a better understanding of the study (45.0%; n=505). Most participants (78.9%; n=884) wanted to learn about the trial findings through written summary and a group meeting with other participants at the nearest clinic (31.1%, n=349). Multivariable regression analysis indicated that participants from rural/peri-urban clinics were more likely to choose non-electronic media dissemination approaches such as a group meeting as compared to urban-dwelling participants. Frequently selected items (>50% of participants) for content included information regarding good results of the study, purpose of the study, medical treatment advances, results specific to me, and how study was conducted. There was heterogenicity in the preference for dissemination content: compared to urban clinics rural clinics are less likely to want to learn about how and why study was conducted and medical and scientific advances. Overall, the majority wanted to learn about trial results, highlighting the importance of integrating dissemination into research activities in PNG. Variation in preferences for mode and content of dissemination between study clinics suggests that dissemination activities could be tailored to local context and preferences.

Background: Systematic reviews of clinical prediction models increasingly include studies using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods alongside traditional multivariable regression approaches. A previously published Excel tool enabled standardised data extraction using the CHARMS checklist and risk of bias assessment using PROBAST. The recent publication of the PROBAST+AI framework, which distinguishes the assessment of model development quality from the assessment of model evaluation risk of bias and assesses applicability in both parts, necessitates an updated digital instrument applicable across prediction modelling methods. Methods: We updated an open-access Excel tool to incorporate the full PROBAST+AI framework. The updated template incorporates structural separation between assessment of model development quality and model evaluation risk of bias, with applicability assessed in both parts. It also incorporates updated signalling questions, including those addressing methodological issues particularly relevant to AI/ML, and automates the generation of summary tables and graphical displays. Results: The updated tool (CHARMS & PROBAST+AI Template) contains 11 worksheets and supports data extraction and appraisal for up to 30 prediction models. Dedicated, linked worksheets enable separate assessment of model development and model evaluation, with Domain 4 distinguishing among Apparent, Internal, and External evaluation settings. Key updates include dedicated assessments for predictor pre-processing, class imbalance handling and recalibration, data leakage prevention, and replication of the full model development pipeline within resampling procedures. Automated sheets dynamically format tables and summary charts covering PROBAST+AI parts. Conclusions: The CHARMS & PROBAST+AI Excel template provides a standardised, user-friendly, and rigorous digital framework for systematic reviewers appraising traditional statistical and AI-driven clinical prediction models.

Background: Fibrosis, characterised by excessive accumulation of collagen type I (COL1), is a common feature of chronic diseases, including liver diseases (LDs), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and heart failure (HF). COL1 degradation products can be detected in urine by proteomics/ peptidomics analyses and may serve as non-invasive biomarkers of fibrosis. We aimed to identify a common molecular signature of fibrosis across these diseases that may ultimately guide interventions to slow disease progression and prevent organ damage. Methods: Using capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry (CE-MS), naturally occurring COL1 degradation products (peptides) in the urine of patients with fibrotic disease, LDs (n=127), CKD (n=263) or HF (n=187), were investigated and compared with the same number of matched controls. Disease-associated COL1 peptides were identified separately for each condition, and peptides showing consistent associations across the three diseases were selected to define a common fibrosis signature. A support vector machine model based on the selected peptides was developed and validated in independent cohorts of patients with LDs (n=110), CKD (n=93), HF (n=32) and controls (n=643). Results: We identified a common fibrotic signature consisting of 50 COL1 degradation products, mainly downregulated in fibrosis. A model based on these peptides achieved a strong performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.935 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.917-0.953, p<0.0001) in an external validation cohort comprising pooled disease groups (LDs, CKD, and HF) and controls. Performance was maintained in LDs, CKD and HF, with AUCs of 0.917 (95% CI 0.890-0.944, p<0.0001), 0.951 (95% CI 0.931-0.971, p<0.0001) and 0.950 (95% CI 0.903-0.997, p<0.0001), respectively. The model scores were significantly associated with fibrosis stage in LDs (p=0.0097) and with interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy in CKD (p=0.045). Conclusion: A model of urinary COL1 peptides captures a shared collagen degradation signature across organs and diseases, enabling the non-invasive assessment of fibrosis irrespective of its origin. As these peptides exclusively reflect collagen degradation, the findings suggest impaired collagen degradation as a driver in fibrosis. Future clinical studies are warranted to evaluate the utility of this model for early fibrosis detection and earlier implementation of anti-fibrotic interventions.

Objective: To determine whether paradoxical relief, feeling unusually better after a seizure compared to before it, is more common after functional/dissociative seizures (FDS) than epileptic seizures (ES), quantify its diagnostic accuracy, and explore its relationship with preictal symptoms. Methods: Consecutive patients admitted to a tertiary epilepsy unit for prolonged inpatient EEG monitoring underwent a structured clinical interview on admission, before final multidisciplinary diagnostic classification. Preictal dissociative and autonomic/somatic symptom burden was assessed using items adapted from established questionnaires. Diagnostic classification incorporated clinical history, seizure semiology, video electroencephalography findings, and collateral information. Patients with dual or indeterminate diagnoses were excluded. Associations with paradoxical relief were examined using logistic regression, followed by an exploratory mediation analysis. Results: Of 176 patients assessed, 66 with FDS and 65 with ES were included. Paradoxical relief was reported by 46/66 patients with FDS (69.7%) and 10/65 with ES (15.4%; unadjusted odds ratio [OR] 12.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.57 to 31.09). As a diagnostic signal for FDS, paradoxical relief had 69.7% sensitivity (95% CI 57.1 to 80.4), 84.6% specificity (95% CI 73.5 to 92.4), a positive likelihood ratio of 4.53 (2.51 to 8.19), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.36 (0.24 to 0.52). FDS diagnosis remained independently associated with paradoxical relief after adjustment (OR 10.59, 95% CI 3.42 to 38.06). In a parallel mediation analysis, dissociative symptom burden showed a significant indirect effect, accounting for 19.5% of the association between diagnostic group and relief, whereas the indirect effect through somatic/autonomic symptom burden was not significant. Significance: Paradoxical relief is substantially more common after FDS than ES and may provide a simple, clinically useful diagnostic signal. Its absence does not exclude FDS, and the finding requires external validation. The association with dissociative symptoms is exploratory and supports prospective investigation of whether relief reflects transient resolution of a disturbed, disembodied preictal state.

Objective: Whether a scheduled antiseizure medication (ASM) continues on schedule across the ICU-to-floor transfer has not been characterized. We quantified ASM administration-gap frequency across this transfer and compared it with gap frequency during matched non-transfer intervals in the same patient and drug. Methods: In this retrospective MIMIC-IV (version 3.1) cohort study, we identified epilepsy and status-epilepticus admissions with an ICU stay followed by floor transfer and a scheduled ASM order active at ICU departure. A gap was defined as an interval exceeding 1.5 times the expected dosing interval between the last ICU dose and first floor dose, or no further dose before discharge, and compared with a matched non-transfer control interval in the same patient and drug (paired McNemar test). A multivariable model evaluated six prespecified clinical predictors; sociodemographic variables were summarized descriptively. Results: Among 2,469 ASM transition-by-drug observations (1,583 admissions, 1,335 patients), an administration gap occurred in 251 (10.2%; 95% CI, 8.7%-11.7%). Gap frequency across the transfer exceeded frequency during matched non-transfer control intervals in the same patient and drug: a paired rate difference of 5.8 percentage points (95% CI, 4.4-7.1; 7.5% vs 1.7%; P = 7.3 x 10^-22) before the transfer and 6.4 percentage points (95% CI, 4.9-7.9; 8.9% vs 2.5%; P = 1.9 x 10^-23) after. Gap rates were similar for intravenous-available (9.9%) and oral-only (11.4%) drugs (rate difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.6 to 4.5; P = .34). None of six prespecified predictors reached significance after correction. Significance: An antiseizure medication administration gap occurred in approximately 1 of every 10 drug-transition observations at the ICU-to-floor transfer, exceeding matched non-transfer gap rates by 5.8 to 6.4 percentage points. This transfer-associated excess, rather than any single medication or patient characteristic, supports a structured medication-continuity check.